Socialist Realism

Art, it is said, is not a mirror, but a hammer: it does not reflect, it shapes. -- Leon Trotsky, Literature and Revolution

Socialist Realism

During the 1934 First Congress of Soviet Writers, Socialist Realism became the official policy of the organization.  Loosely defined, it was a style of continuing Russian realism imbued with optimism for the revolution and a focus on the nobility of the workers.

Socialist Realism soon became the policy for all Soviet art.  As the means of producing and publishing art had been taken into state control, this style soon became essential for success in Soviet Russia.  The style extended from painting to fiction to cinema and everything in between.

This policy ended Revolutionary Russia as a center for artistic experiment and has been criticized by many as a repressive policy, but these criticisms have also overshadowed serious appreciation for the beauty of some of these works.

Isaac Brodsky. Lenin in Smolny (1930)

Spectrum of the Left

I've been working on a project recently (more details will come when/if it really develops into something), and one of the little obsessions I got caught in was making a goofy little chart to keep the main leftist tendencies clear and to help newcomers quickly find where they might want to first explore.  All the little decisions really sucked me in, so I thought I should share.  Let me know what you think!

Click here to view the chart.

The Art of the Slogan: Socialism or Barbarism

Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to Socialism or regression into Barbarism. -- Rosa Luxemburg, The Junius Pamphlet (The Crisis of German Social Democracy)

Socialism or Barbarism, There Is No Third Way!

This slogan, as many great radical left slogans, comes from the turmoil of the early 20th Century (1915 is the first time we see a form of it in print which is quoted at the top of this post).  With the rise of large proletarian populations in capitalist nations across Europe came the rise of revolutionary parties and the art of leftist sloganeering with them.

This slogan has proven legs, and at it has, at its heart, a very important meaning.

Ecosocialism or barbarism:  There is no third way! -- Slogan of Climate & Capitalism

 Why It Is Easy to Misunderstand

So isn't this just propaganda equating capitalists with barbarians and calling socialism the only viable alternative?

Not quite, although many radical leftists probably could sign on to such perspectives, but it means something much more interesting

Capitalism was still relatively young at this time, and already it had several recessions.  Even capitalists had a hard time seeing how capitalism could last forever, and Karl Marx had laid down what still holds as the greatest criticism of a social system by defining contradictions within the capitalist idea which would inevitably lead to its end.

10,000 strong Communist rally in Union Square, New York, 08/01/1935

While social democratic reforms helped save capitalism for a time, it is still clear that no economic situation will last forever.  The question, then, is what comes next?

The radical left made it very clear:  capitalism will collapse for good one day, but what could replace it if not socialism?  Barbarism.  Primitive accumulation (think slavery, seizure, etc.) by the strong, fascism, relapse into feudalism (more of an issue in the world of 1915 when many countries were still feudal), etc.

Capitalism Is Not Efficient

More Effective Exploitation Is Not Efficient

Have you wondered why raw materials from the US will be shipped across the world to factories with low wages and long hours, then shipped back and still be sold on the cheap?  It's because labor makes profit.

So what is economic efficiency?  Well, efficiency requires the speaker to figure out what will be considered as important for efficiency (like, most work for least energy, most production for least pollution, etc.)

We are often told that capitalism is an efficient system compared to socialism, but capitalism seeks maximum exploitation of labor.

Labor Theory of Value

This understanding of the source of profit in capitalism comes from the Labor Theory of Value.  It essentially says this:

• Raw materials have a certain value (M)
• Labor uses these materials to build a commodity (M + L)
• The commodity is worth more than the material because labor added value (M + L = C)

That is a simplified version.  This goes into the argument with a bit more depth.

Theism and the Radical Left

Isn't the Radical Left Atheist?

A common misconception of communists and anarchists is that we are all atheists (maybe even hateful to theist beliefs).  While most leftists are secularists, wanting the religious faiths to be separate from governing all of society (certainly the state), we are not all atheists.  Like the anarchist Leo Tolstoy, many of the most respected and well loved figures on the left came to the ideas of liberation through their religious faith.

That being said, many leftists have been outspoken against religion, and leftists have made some of the strongest critiques of religion that exist.  As with many things, we are not all the same.  Below are some leftists of religious backgrounds, as well as a round up of some leftist critiques of religion, as well as a clarification of Marx's famous "opiate of the masses" line.

Liberation Theology

Liberation theology is a religious (mainly Catholic) and political doctrine advocating socialist (in
some cases social democratic) transformation of society, and it does so from an imperative to help the poor and the suffering as taught in the Christian Bible.  The Catholic church has officially dismissed the theology, but this has not stopped its influence in world events.

Especially in South America since the mid-20th century, religious people have made up a large portion of leftist revolutionary movements and resistance against imperialism and fascism.

Famous Leftists from the Civil Rights Era

The Civil Rights Era was not only a victory for justice, it started among radical left circles in the United States.  From the movement came many prominent religious leaders whose political ideals fall on the left.  The two most notable names are Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X.

Martin Luther King, Jr. was not only religious, he was a Baptist preacher.  By the end of his life, MLK considered economic oppression to be the root of the evil he saw in society, and he was organizing the Poor People's Campaign to bring about a (peaceful) revolution towards socialism.

You show me a capitalist, and I'll show you a bloodsucker. -- Malcolm X

Malcolm X was another religious leader and radical leftist who arose from the civil rights movement and the early black power movement.

Religion in Really Existing Socialism

The treatment of religious institutions under really existing socialism has given many people the idea that the left is inherently against religion.  Much of the thought behind the secularization of many of these states involved promoting materialist philosophy and socializing the great wealth of many churches.

Marxism and Religion

A lot of anti-left propaganda likes to say that we are all atheists, and much of this comes down to the famous quote of Karl Marx:

Religion is the opiate of the masses. -- Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right

 Marx was a materialist, meaning he believed nothing being the physical existed.  He therefore rejected religion as false, but that is not the point of this quote.  Religion, in its promise to the poor and exploited (the very people who benefit from a communist revolution), are promised happiness in another realm, it cures the fears of death and the dissatisfaction with life.

So while Marxists are all atheists, not all leftists (or communists) are Marxists.


Note: if anyone has a good place to point me to find radical leftists in other religions (I'm certain of many brave Muslim leftists) please message me.

Really Existing Socialism

What "Really Existing Socialism" Refers To

This is the phrase most commonly used on the left to describe societies like the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China under Mao, Revolutionary Cuba, etc.

Other people might use other terms like degenerated workers state, state-capitalism, Marxist-Leninism, etc.  For this site, I will (almost) always use the term "really existing socialism" to refer to these countries and systems as different as they are from each other.

Wait, So the Soviet Union Society Was Socialism?

Well, that's a weakness of the phrase.  Most people on the radical left agree that socialism never really existed in the Soviet Union or related societies.  However, many people in the revolution and the ruling parties either did or still are valiantly fighting to build socialism.

There is no trace of such Communism—that is to say, of any Communism—in Soviet Russia. In fact, the mere suggestion of such a system is considered criminal there, and any attempt to carry it out is punished by death. -- Emma Goldman, There Is No Communism In Russia

Leftist critics of really existing socialist countries sometimes have points in history where a revolution seemed to have stopped pushing for socialism, if they think it ever truly fought for socialism at all.

Benefits of Using the Phrase

I personal will use it because I think it does the following well:

• Parallels the phrase "really existing capitalism"
• Emphasizes historical pressures
• Almost everyone (left, right, and center) knows what you are talking about 

Hindsight:  Two Views on the USSR From Two Leftists

Micheal Parenti has a long (but fascinating) lecture about the fall of the Soviet Union which might give some perspective on what really existed. 

Noam Chomsky with a different view.

10 Things to Never Tell a Radical Leftist

Go ahead, ask me about Dave Grohl one more time...

The People's Revolutionary Democratic Clickbait:
(split from The Revolutionary People's Democratic Clickbait whose clickbait has become revisionist!)

1.  "Communism is great on paper, but it goes against human nature!"

2.  "Anarchy is running around shooting everybody."  Alt:  "True capitalism is anarchism."

3.  "Che Guevara... that's the guy from Nirvana, right?"

The hell did you just say?

4.  "So if you hate capitalism, why don't you get rid of your TV?" 
Alt:  "Why don't you share all your money with me?"

5.  "So did you vote for Obama?"

6.  "Communism... like Hitler and stuff?"

7.  "You're such a liberal."

8.  "I'm a socialist, like FDR."

9.  "If you love it so much move to Russia!"

10.  "Yeah, you'll grow out of that."

Bonus 11.  Mentioning any unshared opinion on George Orwell.

The Gulag Argument: Common Leftist Responses to Repression in Really Existing Socialism

The Gulag Argument

Typically, the biggest issue people have with really existing socialist countries is the Gulag (or the Stasi, or censorship, or any of the famous repressive practices by these societies). The criticism goes something like this:

Communism is so focused on equality and the group that individual rights get ignored. Further, since groups are made up of individuals, the group ends up without rights anyway. You’ve robbed Peter to pay Paul.

I'm going to show the two most common counter-arguments.  The first is a more left-communist or anarchist argument which seeks to condemn these actions by really existing socialist countries.  The second is from defenders of really existing socialist countries.

Note:  this is sidestepping a common reaction to such an argument on the left which is to point out the worldwide mass murder, support of genocide, incarceration, and political repression committed by the capitalist West.  While important to consider, that doesn't actually address the argument above directly.

The Left-Commies and Anarchists Cry Out:  You're Blaming the Wrong Thing

Freedom is always freedom for dissenters. -- Rosa Luxemburg

Libertarian strains on the left are just as (in fact more) anti-Gulga, anti-Stasi, etc. as anyone.  They often point out that anarchists and left-communists were often targets of state repression in these societies.

Their counter-argument insists that it was the mechanism of the state (they often point to the philosophy of Lenin as a right-wing deviation from the norm of the left at the time of the Russian Revolution) as the problem in really existing socialist societies.  These states were running a state-capitalist society (an economy based on the exploitation of workers, just with the state owning the means of production).

By eliminating poverty (capitalists probably celebrate poverty as the "freedom to starve") and pursuing "actual" communism, you evade the Gulag of the USSR and the extreme poverty, imperialist invasion, genocide, and social oppression so pervasive in the capitalist West.

The "Tankie" Response:  History Will Absolve Me

Condemn me, it does not matter: history will absolve me. -- Fidel Castro, History Will Absolve Me

So defenders of the really existing socialist societies ("tankies" as they are lovingly and not-so lovingly called) have two points in their argument:  the West has lied about the true nature of the Gulag and other "repressive" elements of these societies, and what repression did exist were required to defend the real gains of these revolutions against the ongoing military and economic violence of the capitalist nations.

A lot of scholarship goes into refuting capitalist claims of different "crimes" of socialist countries.  Not all of them can be listed here, but a very popular one is Another View of Stalin by Ludo Martens, the work of Grover Furr, and Dongping Han to name a few.  Because the West has so much to gain by taking these either wholly fabricated or greatly exaggerated stories as historical fact, it follows that the capitalist West would promote this as the gospel truth.

Still, many will agree that political repression occurred and that, while struggled for, "communism" was never reached.  That being said, these societies had massive gains in the quality of life for the citizens, progressed these societies out of poverty and feudalism and fear of Western imperialism, and if they have ended, were done so against the democratic wishes of the people and only with disastrous consequences.

An uncommon (but not unheard of) sentiment among these defenders goes along the lines of:  there were prisons, there were executions, there was not tolerance of dissenting views, and that is because the revolutions defended themselves and the gains were worth the necessary sacrifices.

Why the Word "Communism" Is so Misunderstood

A Brief Historical Explanation

The word "communism" has seen things.  The term, still relatively new, was used for over a hundred years in the propaganda of the most powerful countries in human history (in one corner the USA with much of Western Europe, and in the other corner the USSR, the PRC, and allied forces).

Public (and private) schooling in capitalist countries do little to allow the left to tell its side of the story, and the owners of the biggest media companies make money by selling ads, but ads don't work as well after media depicting a leftist message (not for lack of interest in leftism, but in those viewers lack of interest in what is being advertised -- not to mention those media billionaires kind of like capitalism).

So, really, it wouldn't make sense if "communism" wasn't a confusing word.

This Is a Big Problem for the Radical Left...

... because communism is what the Radical Left is all about.

When you can sit down and use a word that one person thinks means an all-power state and another thinks the end of the state, when one person thinks the end of surplus and another thinks the end of scarcity, when one person thinks imprisonment without trial and another thinks true democracy... that word is going to seem a little vague to most people.

Barack Obama is a socialist. -- Sarah Palin

Common Exceptions

The definition I gave is what almost any radical leftist will mean by "communism."  There are, of course, exceptions.  There are also a couple of (sloppy) strategies the left has used to cope with the exceptions and the general misunderstanding.

The most common exception happens when a radical leftist is talking to a non-radical.  Non-radicals often call societies similar to the Soviet Union "communist."  Radical leftists might use that word in that sense to simplify things or just by accidental mirroring of language.  Many communists also defend these societies (China during Mao's leadership for example) anyway, and so clarifying the mistake seems beside the point.

Another exception occurs most often in anarchist circles or when anarchists are talking with communists.  Anarchists might prefer the term "anarchism" to describe "communism" to emphasize the differing beliefs about dealing with the state after revolution.

Two Strategies Or:  What Little Progress Has Been Made for (C/c)larity

One common strategy to clarify whether "communism" is being used to describe the political goal or societies like the Soviet Union is this:

• Lower case "c" for the political goal (e.g. "communism is stateless")
• Upper case "C" for a society like the Soviet Union (e.g. "Communist Russia")

It is clear this doesn't help when starting a sentence with the word or when speaking, but this is one strategy that you will see, especially on the internet.

Another strategy is to use the phrase "really existing socialism" to describe the historical experiences of the Soviet Union, Revolutionary China, etc.

The Still Misunderstood and Misused Word

So the word "(C/c)ommunism" is used (especially in the West or among many non-leftists) to describe Soviet Union style societies, tribal societies (what the radical left calls "primitive communism"), fascism (which communists hate more than capitalism), welfare programs, work safety regulations, progressive tax, secularism, and the list goes on.  Almost as a rule:  if a Western politician didn't like something during the past hundred years or so, it was labelled "communism."

What Is Communism?

What Is Communism?

"Communism" is a political and economic situation with no state or class division and where goods are given out freely to whoever needs them and made freely by whoever will make them.

A communist society is the end goal of communists and anarchists alike (some think we need a few more stops along the way than others).  Communists and anarchists who believe this change requires a revolution make up the radical left.

Seem a Little Idealistic?

Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.  -- Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The Communist Manifesto

Defining communism alone will not do the radical left justice.  There are many good reasons so many have bravely struggled and given their lives in pursuit of communism as a goal.  Scroll to the bottom of the article to find more definitions to see exactly what we mean when we want to abolish the state and eliminate class.  We seek a radical democracy unknowable under capitalism and the state, and we believe an orderly and productive society requires neither capitalism or the state.

There are a few immediate and valid concerns most people have when hearing this definition (like how anything would get done if you could just get free booze and free cable), but some of the greatest minds of the nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty-first centuries have considered these questions and that's how they made up the richest tradition in political philosophy -- the radical left!

If You Think the Word "Communism" Is Confusing, You Are Right!

Here is a little insight into how it got so confusing and a few things that have been done to fix it. 

If Communism Is Still Unclear for You

You will find a definition like this all over the internet, but people still scratch their heads and ask, "okay, so what is communism?"  If you are feeling that way, that is common.  I added some links at the bottom that might clear up some confusion (an ever growing list).

Other Terms to Help You Out

Many of the terms used to describe communism (like "state," "class," and "abolition of private property") have very specific meanings (and some have several specific meanings) amongst the radical left.  Because of this, many people that are not radical leftists tend to think of these words a bit differently.  So let's refine what we mean a little!

• What Do Radical Leftists Mean by the State?
• What Do Radical Leftists Mean By Class?  
• What Do Radical Leftists Mean By Private Property? (and why do you want to abolish it?) 
• Wondering about countries like the USSR and Cuba?